I want to note that the text on the page currently is not "MY" opinion, it's what I gauge as the general opinion of the folks at the peedy forums. But I might be wrong, so
what are your thoughts on the current page? &&& please edit! Cramulus 17:11, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
As someone guilty of Original Pinealism and so who lost all confidence in his ability to interact with the Cool Kids of Discordianism... Edit
This page makes me sad. =(
126.96.36.199 23:50, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
It's true enough, though.
I think the basic point is that all Discordians recognize that Pinealism is Useful when applied against Cabbages. But when you drag it out in front of other Discordians and flaunt it around, you're (not so) subtly calling them Cabbages. Gee, I wonder why people who 'understand' the Principia Discordia would have a problem with that....
I categorized this article as Fixit. For the most part, I think it's a really good article. But it has some issues.
- Spacing is off, especially at the end. Indenting is making boxes that don't seem to be needed
- Tone changes from encyclopedic to personal. Most seems to be encyclopedic
- Personal references seem jarring without sources
Miley Spears Discordian American Princess to the Stars (let's talk) 02:07, April 11, 2015 (UTC)